Ⅳ. Translate the following paragraphs into Chinese.

Right to Confront Accusers

The 6th Amendment guarantees that the accused“shall enjoy the right...to be confronted with the witnesses against him...”This right stems from the long adversary tradition that recognizes the value of giving a defendant the opportunity to see his or her accusers publicly and to cross-examine them. A paradigm case is Pointer v Texas,380 U. S.400, in which a robbery victim had testified against the defendant at the preliminary hearing, but subsequently moved out of state. At trial, the prosecution introduced a transcript of the victim's testimony and the defendant was convicted. This, the Supreme Court held, violated the right of confrontation.

The right to confront one's accusers includes the right to cross-examine them. Thus, in Davis v. Alaska,415 U.S.308, the prosecution witness, a juvenile delinquent on probation for burglary, testified against the defendant, but the trial court entered a protective order prohibiting the witness from being cross-examined. The Supreme Court held this to be a violation of the right of confrontation. And in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S.123, Bruton was implicated in his co-defendant Evans's confession, but Bruton was unable to cross-examine Evans because Evans had exercised his right not to take the stand. Although the jury was told that Evan's confession should be considered solely as evidence of his guilt and not Bruton's, the Supreme Court held that this was insufficient protection. If such a co-defendant confession is used, it must be edited to remove any reference to the defendant.